Expert Meetings and Workshop Central to WG II AR5 Development Cycle |
Joint Expert Meeting of WGI and WGII on
| ||||||||||
25-27 January, 2010 — Boulder, Colorado, USAProjections in the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) will be based largely on the Coupled Model Intercomparison Phase 5 (WCRP CMIP5), a collaborative process in which the community has agreed on the type of simulations to be performed. The widespread participation in CMIP5 provides some perspective on model uncertainty. Nevertheless, these intercomparisons are not designed to yield formal error estimates and remain "ensembles of opportunity."
The reliability of projections could be improved if the models were weighted according to some measure of skill and if their interdependencies were taken into account. Recent studies have started to address these issues by proposing ways to weight or rank models, based on process evaluation, agreement with present day observations, past climate or observed trends, but there is no consensus on how such a model selection or weighting process could be agreed upon.
This expert meeting will provide tentative best practices in selecting and combining results from multiple models for IPCC AR5; in short the beginning of a quantitative framework for analysis and assessment of the models. The meeting will help to bring the community into a position to make better use of the new model results and provide more robust and reliable projections of future climate, along with improved estimates of uncertainty. Specific aims of the meeting will be to maximize the robustness and policy relevance of the projections provided in the presence of model error, projection uncertainty, observational uncertainties and a heterogeneous set of models. Interactions between WGI and WGII will be ensured by the participation of a number of representatives from WGII with broad expertise on impacts and user needs.
|
|
|
|
| Assessing and Combining Multi-Model Climate Projections | |
|
|
|
|
25-27 January, 2010
Boulder, Colorado, USA | |
Joint IPCC Workshop of WGII and WGIII on
Socioeconomic Scenarios for Climate Change Impact and Response Assessments
1-3 NOVEMBER 2010 — LOCATION TBDDuring the development phase, the IPCC Expert Meeting Towards New Scenarios for Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies (Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, 19-21 September, 2007) called for the organization of a meeting of the integrated assessment and impacts and adaptation communities to develop a joint strategy for storyline development. The need for such a expert meeting was reiterated by the Task Group established by the IPCC during its 30th session in Antalya, Turkey (21-23 April, 2009) to facilitate the catalytic role of the IPCC.
The RCPs and associated climate model simulations are envisioned to be complemented by a "library of socioeconomic scenarios and storylines" to inform impacts and adaptation analyses and IAM emission trajectories in ways that are mutually consistent. While each RCP was generated by an IAM driven by a set of assumptions about future socioeconomic development, technology, and policy, many other alternative sets of assumptions could result in similar concentration/radiative forcing pathways. This flexibility is an intentional and innovative feature of the RCP process. However, the assumptions chosen can significantly affect the outcomes of impacts and adaptation projections and analyses. Consistent scenario definitions of baseline and mitigation scenarios are critical to ensure comparability across studies that will be assessed in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). An IPCC expert meeting involving the relevant communities engaged with the scenario development will address these issues.
|
Joint IPCC Expert Meeting of WGI and WGII on
|
||||||||||
17-19 JANUARY 2011 — Okinawa, JAPANThe oceans currently absorb about one-third of fossil fuel CO2 emitted to the atmosphere and have, as a consequence, been increasing in acidity. Ocean acidification is now recognized as a critical component of global change, potentially responsible for a wide range of impacts on ecosystems, with subsequent consequences on livelihoods and food security. Further, one important aspect is that more CO2 mitigation may be required to achieve particular stabilization targets, because acidification limits the ability of the oceans to continue to absorb CO2. Previous IPCC assessment reports considered biogeochemical and temperature effects of anthropogenic carbon on the oceans, but the direct impacts of ocean acidification, its combined effects with ocean warming on marine ecosystems and productivity, and potential feedbacks to the climate system have not been fully assessed.
Since the publication of the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), ocean acidification research, especially experimental studies of the impact of increased concentrations of seawater CO2 on marine biology in different regions, and modeling studies of future ocean environments, has been advancing rapidly. Given this progress and increasing interest from stakeholders in understanding the implications of ocean acidification, an IPCC Expert Meeting will discuss the rapidly advancing scientific findings on ocean acidification and its impacts since the publication of IPCC AR4, and to provide scientific information as input to Fifth Assessment Report (AR5).
|
|
|
|
| Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Marine Biology and Ecosystems | |
|
|
|
Joint Expert Meeting of WGII and WGIII on
|
||||||||||
March 2011 (exact dates TBD) — Calcutta, IndiaCities and other human settlements are at the forefront of climate change. As large emitters of GHG emissions, they significantly contribute to climate change. Simultaneously, due to their concentration of population and infrastructure assets, cities are especially vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. Infrastructure investments in the near future will determine the emission paths of cities in the long-run. Hence, cities are a point where adaptation is necessary and mitigation is possible, in a context of sustainable development.
While urban planning is referenced in IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) at times, there is no comprehensive survey on the role which urban planning can play in adaptation and mitigation, let alone a quantitative overview of the possible contributions of different measures and their costs. Encompassing strategies for urban areas are not discussed. Neither are there estimates on current GHG emissions related to infrastructure. If infrastructure is mentioned, only case studies are presented, stating nothing about general applicability. AR4 states that a credible assessment on general adaptation prospects and on mitigation in the transport sector is limited due to the number and scope of available studies of mitigation potential and cost. This expert meeting will further explore issues related to human settlements and infrastructure as an input to the AR5 process.
|
|
|
|
| Human Settlement, Water, Energy and Transport Infrastructure — Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies | |
|
|
|
Joint Expert Meeting of WGII and WGIII on
Economic Analysis, Costing Methods and Ethics
October 2011 (exact dates TBD)At the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) scoping meeting (13-17 July, 2009, Venice, Italy), the need to clarify a number of cost and valuation concepts and their underlying rationale emerged. In particular, this includes problems with representing climate impacts in monetary and non-monetary terms, and with aggregating benefits and costs and the implications for cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and other methods. Furthermore, the ethical dimensions of estimating costs of mitigation, adaptation and residual damages are in need of assessment.
An expert meeting will address these issues, congregating a diverse set of views to make suggestions for creation of assessment frameworks. In particular, the meeting will address topics such as identification and comparison of metrics, measuring risk and valuing information, technical change, adaptation as an economic process, integrated assessment, behavioral dimensions, intra- and intergenerational justice and costs, economic and ethical implications of decision making under uncertainty, social cost-benefit analysis, and optimal carbon prices in second-best settings.
|




